Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

#69: Culture and Development of Illness Causation Understanding in Chinese and American Children

Name: Christina Hu
Major: Psychology
Hometown: Libertyville
Faculty Sponsor: Melanie Nyhof
Other Sponsors:  
Type of research: Senior thesis

Abstract

This study explored the possible similarities and differences between Chinese and American children’s understanding of illness and health, as well as the influences of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in coordination with modern society. In China, child participants were recruited from schools in Beijing and Hubei. The adult participants in China were recruited from universities in Beijing. In the U.S., participants were recruited from schools and universities in Michigan and California. Groups of 4-5, 6-7, and 8-10-year-olds were interviewed while adults were asked to answer two questionnaires; both contain the same questions and try to capture which possible explanations of illness they endorse. Possible explanations were coded in the following categories: psychogenic, behavioral, biological, symptomatic, immanent justice, qì/autonomous energy/vitalism, pollution, and others. Both Chinese and Americans prioritize the causes of illness in the same order of effect: biological, vitalistic, psychogenic, and, lastly, immanent justice, but to varying degrees. It was also found that the older the age group, the more likely participants attributed biological causes to be the main reason for illness as well as believed that coexistence of causes could be possible. This supports the idea of some effect of culture and age on the understanding of what causes illness.

Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });