Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

#02: The Furies and the Never-Ending Fire

Name: Madelyn Leppiaho
Major: History
Hometown: Luxemburg, WI
Faculty Sponsor: John Kirk
Other Sponsors:  
Type of research: Course project

Abstract

I chose to submit a paper for Intellectual Foundations on "The Oresteia" that addressed the significance of the Furies’ new position in Athens and how Athena convinced them to stay. After reading the play, I started to see connections to everything seemingly “new” throughout the play. In the paper, I walk through these new situations, the fire ending the Trojan War and Cassandra’s vision, and explain how they ultimately end in death, violence, and fire. Therefore, when Athena gives the Furies a “new” position in the city, one can assume this will end similarly. These commonalities lead me to the ultimate claim of the paper; just like in the play, everything part of human life that is seemingly “new” is only part of a larger cycle of violence. Through the examples presented, I argue that nothing humans do truly matters because of the inevitability of this cycle. Although this view may lead those who read this paper to feel hopeless, that is not my intent. There’s a reason we, as humans, don’t see every bad event in the world all at once. I believe there’s value in being in the middle of realizing our horrific actions of violence and living in ignorance of what we as humans have done. Writing this paper made me realize I wanted to be in that middle.

Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });