Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

#54: Psychiatric Sexism: A Gendered History of American Mental Health Diagnoses, Treatments, and Institutionalization

Name: Abigail Swihart
Major: History
Hometown: Kenosha, WI
Faculty Sponsor:
Other Sponsors:  
Type of research: Senior thesis

Abstract

To understand gender in a historical context is to understand that the masculine has historically held power over the feminine in all circumstances of life. When researching historical situations, it is essential to look at the topic from the point of view of the masculine and the feminine, whereas events have traditionally been studied from a strictly masculine perspective. This research essay will look at the United State’s history of mental health diagnoses and treatments. A gendered perspective highlights how this history affected women and men differently. All mental patients were feminized by a patriarchal system that placed (white, male) doctors in a relationship of dominance over their subordinate patients. Female-presenting patients and patients excluded from US whiteness were further subordinated by their increased femininity. These patients experienced more oppressive diagnoses and treatments designed to remove autonomy. This essay examines how gender affects diagnoses, treatment, and the overall doctor-patient relationship in the United States from the late 1800s to the 1970s primarily using first hand patient accounts and hospital records.

Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });