Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: A Call for Renewed Strength — Presentation Detail — Celebration of Scholars

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

Jun Wang
Kim Instenes
John Kirk
Nora Nickels
Andrew Pustina
James Ripley

Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: A Call for Renewed Strength

Name: Eric Bernard
Major: Political Science
Hometown: Darien, IL
Faculty Sponsor: Jerald Mast
Other Sponsors:
Type of research: Senior thesis

Abstract

In light of the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Voting Rights Act’s (VRA) Section 5 in Shelby County, AL v. Holder (2013), many scholars and politicians have taken up the debate over whether federal preclearance is necessary to ensure minority enfranchisement in modern times. It is the intention of this thesis to determine whether federal preclearance is still necessary to guarantee minority political participation and equality. This study combines data from political, economic, and social spheres to determine if political equality has been achieved and how this has been affected by Section 5. Some of the variables examined include voting rates, income levels, and incarceration rates. After close analysis, the data suggests that Section 5 is still necessary to ensure minority political participation and equality. Moreover, the study comes to the conclusion that Section 5 should be advanced into a state of national coverage.