Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

Was Jesus Arrested at the Last Supper? : A Reexamination of Judas 58,9-26 of the Gospel of Judas

Name: Brian Hansen
Major: Religion
Hometown: Arlington Heights, IL
Faculty Sponsor:
Other Sponsors:  
Type of research: Senior thesis

Abstract

My purpose for writing this paper was to become a contributor to the ongoing scholarly discussions on the recently discovered Gospel of Judas, an apocryphal gospel that has been at the forefront of my academic interest during my years here at Carthage College.  This paper specifically focuses on the Gospel of Judas’ concluding passage – Judas 58,9-26 – a passage that has been understood by scholars as this gospel’s portrayal of Jesus’ arrest. My research method for this topic consisted of acquiring various scholarly sources on the Gospel of Judas and surveying them to see if any had made comments on Judas 58,9-26. I had discovered that there were few that addressed Judas 58,9-26, nevertheless, those that did still produced a range of controversies that clearly illustrate a division within Gospel of Judas scholarship. With that being said, my research specifically explores the standard interpretations of Judas 58,9-26 in relation to the Greek word kataluma – both its meanings and its root origins – in order to show that the earlier critical interpretations have not taken into account the full range of this word’s meaning. Consequently, my findings suggest a new interpretation of Judas 58,9-26, based on the more complete understanding of kataluma.
$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });