Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

The Power of Two: Reciprocal Feminism in Browning's "Aurora Leigh"

Name: Tyler Strohl
Major: English
Hometown: Aurora, Illinois
Faculty Sponsor: Alyson Kiesel
Other Sponsors:  
Type of research: Senior thesis

Abstract

The Power of Two: Reciprocal Feminism in Browning's Aurora Leigh 

Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s self-proclaimed “novel in verse” Aurora Leigh (1856), centers on two female characters, Marian Erle and Aurora Leigh, both of whom pursue non-conforming roles in Victorian England. For the purpose of this argument, Aurora and Marian’s relationship has been classified as reciprocal and complementary. Aurora and Marian are characters that emerge from the patriarchic society, particularly because of their reciprocal relationship. This thesis ties in the emergence of their non-traditional traits and the complementary nature of Aurora and Marian, which qualifies them as ‘new women.’ This thesis addresses Browning’s novel through the immediate emergence and independence of Aurora and the subsequent mentoring of Marian by Aurora into a leading character herself. Paying specific attention to the intimacy of Aurora and Marian, and Marian’s newborn son, this paper addresses how the complementary nature of the principle characters’ relationship promotes their classification as ‘new women.’ It uses a feminist approach to analyze Aurora’s attitudes and actions, then explore Aurora’s continuing independence as well as her modeling and guidance to Marian on her own search for clarity and self-governance. Finally, this paper analyzes the end of the novel, where Aurora marries Romney Leigh and Marian chooses to raise her own son as an independent woman, and how the culminations of each female character contributes to the overall classification of Aurora and Marian.

Primary Source

Barrett Browning, Elizabeth. Aurora Leigh. 1859. Margaret Reynolds. Norton Critical Edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1996.

 

Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });