Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

Assessing the Effects of Laissez-Faire Political Economy on Irish Famine Relief

Name: Timothy Tennyson
Major: Political Science
Hometown: Pleasant Prairie, WI
Faculty Sponsor: John Leazer
Other Sponsors:  
Type of research: Course project

Abstract

 This paper presents a case study of public works and workhouses in Ireland during the Great Famine with the purpose of analyzing the influence of laissez-faire policies on the effectiveness of British governmental relief under the Whig administration. This study limits its focus to the years of 1846-1852, a period in which the nation of Ireland experienced a net population loss of over 1 million. Through the use of primary source documents, secondary historical accounts, and a case study framework, this research provides a unique contribution to the continuing historiographical debate between Irish nationalist historians and their English counterparts. Ultimately, this paper contends that although public works and workhouses faced severe impediments to their efficacy regardless of British policy, the government’s strict adherence to the principles of laissez-faire political economy directly precipitated the demise of each of these systems of relief. This conclusion highlights a demand for further historical research on the aims and motivations of British government officials during the Great Famine, with a particular focus on public works and workhouses.

Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });