Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

Academic Self-Concept Predicts Grade Point Average and Course Grade in Carthage College Freshman

Name: David Rademacher
Department: Social Science
Type of research: Independent research
Funding: Carthage College Provost, Faculty Research and Development Grant

Name: Micala Giammarino
Major: Psychological Science
Hometown: Villa Park, IL
Faculty Sponsor:
Other Sponsors:  
Type of research: Independent research
Funding: Carthage College Provost, Faculty Research and Development Grant

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to provide a better understanding of the factors predictive of academic achievement (i.e., grade point average (GPA) and course grade (expressed as a percentage)) in college freshman. The participants were 37 Carthage College freshman (8 males, 29 females; mean age = 18.3 years). The participants completed a series of online questionnaires to assess the following: academic classification, gender, ethnicity, age, GPA, academic self-concept (ASC), non-academic self-concept, general esteem, and perceived class rank. The course instructors provided information regarding the participants’ course grades. Together, ASC, perceived class rank, and gender explained 59.6% of the variance in the GPAs. The inclusion of non-academic self-concept, general esteem, ethnicity, and age did not significantly increase the proportion of variance in GPAs explained. Together, ASC and ethnicity explained 56.1% of the variance in the course grades. The inclusion of non-academic self-concept, general esteem, perceived class rank, gender, and age did not significantly increase the proportion of variance in course grades explained. Whereas ASC, perceived class rank, and gender are good predictors of freshman GPAs, ASC and ethnicity are good predictors of freshman course grades.

Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });