On Hobbes's Treatment of Punishment in Leviathan — Presentation Detail — Celebration of Scholars

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

Jun Wang
Kim Instenes
John Kirk
Nora Nickels
Andrew Pustina
James Ripley

On Hobbes's Treatment of Punishment in Leviathan

Name: Timothy Tennyson
Major: Political Science
Hometown: Pleasant Prairie, WI
Faculty Sponsor: Paul Ulrich
Other Sponsors:
Type of research: Senior thesis

Abstract

Although the Orthodox interpretation of Hobbes’s sovereign as an omnipotent despot who compels absolute obedience via the implementation of cruel and arbitrary punishment seems to be supported by a cursory reading of Leviathan, a comprehensive examination of Hobbes’s thought on the purpose and character of punishment offers a reconceptualization of the sovereign as a non-tyrannical entity driven exclusively by his duty to maintain state security. This article utilizes both Hobbes’s text (Leviathan) and pertinent secondary literature to support this claim. After depicting the orthodox interpretation of the sovereign in the existing literature, Hobbes’s definition of punishment is utilized as the central framework for a thorough examination of the purpose and character of punishment in Leviathan. This analytical method reveals the proto-liberal nature of Hobbes’s penal theory by demonstrating both its provision of substantive rights and its inherent limitations. Subsequently, an acknowledgement of the limited efficacy of sovereign punishment leads to a consideration of the essential role of statewide education in engendering communal obedience. Finally, this in-depth account of Hobbesian punishment and its relationship to civic education offers a reformed image of the sovereign, which in turn alters traditional conceptions of life in the Hobbesian commonwealth. Ultimately, this conclusion calls for future research on 1) the practicality of Hobbes’s proposed state and 2) the validity of his conception of human nature and the ultimate end of human existence.

Poster file