Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

Surprising Sound Symbolism Effects Are (Likely) Experimental Artifacts

Name: Tessa Constantine
Major: Psychology / Sociology
Hometown: Arlington Heights, IL
Faculty Sponsor: Anthony Barnhart
Other Sponsors:  
Type of research: Senior thesis

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that an inherent or non-arbitrary base for language exists, especially with regards to the concept of sound symbolism. Nygaard, Cook, and Namy (2009) presented evidence that participants learned the true meanings of spoken Japanese words more easily than a set of random, erroneous translations. We suggest that their curious finding may be better described as a prosody effect than a sound symbolism effect. If the stimuli were created with rich prosody, those cues could facilitate learning irrespective of each word’s phonology. We replicated and extended the work of Nygaard et al. by testing learning across recognition memory (a direct replication) and recall tasks, using stimuli that were generated with or without magnified prosody. A follow up study was conducted in which recall memory was employed to omit confounds identified in the previous study. We were unable to replicate results indicated in the work of Nygaard et al. Therefore, we suggest that the recognition memory task is currently inconclusive in determining sound symbolic interaction. In a similar recall memory task, participants’ performance was inhibited by the presence of prosody for random translation word pairs. These results support the notion that prosody has an influence on language learning capabilities, particularly an adverse effect when translations are incorrect. Further analysis must be conducted into the influence of sound symbolism to determine its impact on language comprehension.

Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });