Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

The External Feature Advantage in Handwritten Word Perception

Name: Micala Giammarino
Major: Psychological Science
Hometown: Villa Park
Faculty Sponsor: Anthony Barnhart
Other Sponsors:  
Type of research: Independent research

Abstract

The External Feature Advantage in Handwritten Word Perception

Beech and Mayall (2005) reported that masked priming of external features of a printed word (the tops and bottoms) facilitated perception to a greater extent than internal features. This experiment explored whether this external feature advantage holds in the perception of handwritten words. Previous research has suggested that configural processes are recruited to a greater extent in the perception of handwritten than typewritten words (Barnhart & Goldinger 2013). If true, then the word shape information provided by the external features should have added utility in priming the perception of the complete handwritten word. Participants completed a word naming task with handwritten and typewritten words preceded by masked primes containing the external or internal features of each word. We recorded verbal response times to name each word. A repeated-measures ANOVA showed that there was no significant Script by Prime Type interaction, and the external primes did not reduce naming times to a greater extent for cursive than for typewritten words. A greater external feature advantage for cursive stimuli would have supported the notion that configural processes hold more utility in the perception of handwritten words, a theory that has largely been discounted in the word perception literature due to overreliance on typewritten stimuli.

Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });