Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

Human Eye Movements: Patterns of Saccadic Eye Movements and Fixation in “Reading” Graphical Data

Name: Holly Pelnar
Major: Psychology
Hometown: Tinley Park, IL
Faculty Sponsor: Leslie Cameron
Other Sponsors: Robbins, Arryn
Type of research: SURE
Funding: SURE

Abstract

It is widely known that the more experience one has, the greater their ability will be to perform a set task.  This statement holds true for an individual’s ability to read and interpret graphs. In previous studies, Lovette and Shah (2007) found that experts are better able to recognize patterns within data and, with more statistical knowledge, can come to conclusions about the presented graphs relatively easier than students.  Okan et al. (2016) also reported that individuals who had more graph literacy were better able to identify and attend to task-relevant information. In the present study, students and faculty at Carthage College will be asked to view sixteen graphs, eight of which use ambiguous variables. Participants will be asked to verbally describe and interpret each graph and an Eye Tracker Portable Duo will record their fixation patterns.  Verbal responses will be recorded, coded, and given a ranking based on a 5-point scale system. The results of this study are expected to reveal different patterns in the scan paths of experts and students, and that experts earn a higher average score on their verbal responses. The implications of these findings will help instructors better understand why students struggle to interpret graphs and then develop new teaching strategies that will further improve the students’ abilities.


Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });