An Evaluation of Cambered Barbell Squat Variations and Their Inluences on 1RM and Kinetic Variables — Presentation Detail — Celebration of Scholars

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

Jun Wang
Kim Instenes
John Kirk
Nora Nickels
Andrew Pustina
James Ripley

An Evaluation of Cambered Barbell Squat Variations and Their Inluences on 1RM and Kinetic Variables

Name: Benjamin Nolan
Major: Exercise Science
Hometown: Prospect Heights, IL
Faculty Sponsor: Andrew (Tony) Pustina
Other Sponsors:
Type of research: SURE

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences in peak force (PF) and mean concentric force (MF) exist between three squat conditions: 1) barbell back squat (BS), 2)safety bar back squat (SSB) 3) and a hand supported BS using the SSB (Hatfield Squat), at one-rep maximal (1RM) intensities. Five males (23 ± 5.37 yrs; 92.18 ± 3.34 kg; 187.96 ± 8.98 cm; relative 1RM BS: 1.5 ± 0.2 kg˖kg^-1) volunteered to participate in the study. A 1RM was then determined within 3-4 maximal attempts. Differences between squat conditions were analyzed using a repeated-measures ANOVA and Cohen’s d. The main finding of the study was Hatfield squats allowed for higher loads, as well as higher peak and mean forces than the other two squat conditions. The increased stability provided in the Hatfield squat allows for an individual to more effectively use their leg musculature.