Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

The Extreme Funding of the United States to Form a Stable Nation of South Korea to Oppose Communism in North East Asia

Name: Adam Szalacinski
Major: Psychology
Hometown: Greenfield, WI
Faculty Sponsor:
Other Sponsors: None
Type of research: Course Project

Abstract

Between 1953 and 1960 the United States extensively funded South Korea, which may seem odd given the number of other young nations that could have benefited from U.S. aid. With U.S. involvement in the Middle East, nation-building has once again become a hot topic. This paper looks at the origins of nation-building in the beginning of the Cold War. We utilize existing research and newspapers from the mid 1950’s from Korea at the Center for Research Libraries in Chicago to obtain our data.  The data suggests that the amount of funds contributed by the United States continually increased. We investigate the phenomenon, particularly questioning why so much money was invested in the new nation of South Korea?

We discover the part of the rationale in a complex web of Cold War battles demonstrating superiority, or the perception of superiority, between the United States and communist nations. The United States believed that if they did not insure the success of South Korea, communism would have won another show of power, leading to the need to display democratic dominance in Korea.

Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });