Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

Effects of Plyometric Training versus Traditional Weight Training on Increase in Vertical Jump Height

Name: Benjamin McCurley
Major: Athletic Training
Hometown: Saint Charles
Faculty Sponsor: Ashley Greenwood ’14
Other Sponsors:  
Type of research: Course project

Abstract

There are dozens of ways to improve vertical jump and several groups of advocates for each touting one style's superiority. The purpose of the review is to investigate and contrast the effects of strength training against plyometric training on vertical jump improvement in people over 18 years old. Ten scholarly articles were found through the Google Scholar and PubMed databases, consolidated together, and analyzed to find the objectively better training technique to increase vertical jump height. Key terms used were "plyometric," "strength training," and "vertical jump." After reading through the articles, the outcome most supported by empirical evidence seems to show that a mixture of both methods yields the most remarkable results. Between the two methods themselves, it appears plyometric training has a slightly more significant improvement in the vertical jump along with better improvement in biomechanics. Health professions focusing on improving a patient's vertical jump, whether it be for sports or rehabilitating them back to their original strength, can use the information to hasten the patient's progress by incorporating more plyometric training.


Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });