Skip to main content

Instructions

Student presentations must have a faculty sponsor.

Abstracts must include a title and a description of the research, scholarship, or creative work. The description should be 150-225 words in length and constructed in a format or style appropriate for the presenter’s discipline.

The following points should be addressed within the selected format or style for the abstract:

  • A clear statement of the problem or question you pursued, or the scholarly goal or creative theme achieved in your work.
  • A brief comment about the significance or uniqueness of the work.
  • A clear description of the methods used to achieve the purpose or goals for the work.
  • A statement of the conclusions, results, outcomes, or recommendations, or if the work is still in progress, the results you expect to report at the event.

Presenter photographs should be head and shoulder shots comparable to passport photos.

Additional Information

More information is available at carthage.edu/celebration-scholars/. The following are members of the Research, Scholarship, and Creativity Committee who are eager to listen to ideas and answer questions:

  • Jun Wang
  • Kim Instenes
  • John Kirk
  • Nora Nickels
  • Andrew Pustina
  • James Ripley

A Comparative Analysis of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair to Reconstruction

Name: Brody Ilstrup
Major: Athletic Training
Hometown: St. Louis Park
Faculty Sponsor: Ashley Greenwood ’14
Other Sponsors:  
Type of research: Independent research
Funding: no funding

Abstract

Title: A Comparative Analysis of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair to Reconstruction 


There is an overall increased return to play time associated with ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction in high level athletes. A new surgical technique of repairing the UCL has been shown to shorten the return to play time. This literature review was conducted to identify alternative UCL surgery techniques to inform athletic trainers, patients, and other health care providers of these alternative treatments. The methods used to find resources to support the problem were through google scholar, PubMed, and JSTOR peer reviewed studies that compared the reconstruction of the UCL to different techniques for repair. The majority demographics of these articles consisted of high school age to professional level pitchers with a chronic or acute UCL pathology. The literature review consists of 8 scholarly articles that are included, and 20 that have been searched. The conclusion of this analysis presented repairing the UCL showed a lower failure rate and decreased return to play time in baseball pitchers. On average, athletes were throwing at the same level or higher within six months after surgery was performed. Additionally, UCL repair adequately restored the valgus stability of the elbow. Continued research is needed to identify the long term outcomes of UCL repair.


Poster file

$(function() { $('#print h2').prepend('Print'); $('#print h2 a').click(function() { window.print(); return false; }); });